A hotel takes a guest’s money in exchange for a room the guest is supposed to be safe in. When a guest is attacked inside that room, in a hallway, in a stairwell or in a parking lot, the hotel can be answerable for it.
Texas gives an injured guest two distinct routes, and they have different requirements.
This is the ordinary premises claim. It requires two separate showings.
Foreseeability. Timberwalk Apartments, Partners, Inc. v. Cain, 972 S.W.2d 749 (Tex. 1998), directs courts to weigh whether criminal conduct previously occurred on or near the property, how recently, how often, how similar, and what publicity it received such that the owner knew or should have known.
Del Lago Partners, Inc. v. Smith, 307 S.W.3d 762 (Tex. 2010), adds that those factors “are not the only reasons that a criminal act might be deemed foreseeable.” A hotel that watched a situation escalate, that had been warned, or that knew about a specific person on the property is within Del Lago’s reasoning regardless of the crime statistics.
Unreasonableness. UDR Texas Properties, L.P. v. Petrie, 517 S.W.3d 98 (Tex. 2017), holds that foreseeability alone is not enough: “Foreseeability is the beginning, not the end, of the analysis in determining the extent of the duty to protect against criminal acts of third parties.” The plaintiff must offer evidence weighing the risk against the burden of preventing it. In a hotel case that usually means evidence about what a working keycard system, a staffed front desk, a functioning camera, or a lock that had been reported broken would have cost and would have prevented.
Hotels and motels are where a substantial share of trafficking happens, and Texas wrote a statute that reaches the property rather than only the trafficker.
Section 98.002(a) imposes liability on a defendant who traffics or who intentionally or knowingly benefits from participating in a venture that traffics another person, for damages arising from the trafficking by the defendant or the venture.
A hotel that knowingly profited from a trafficking operation running out of its rooms is squarely the kind of defendant that clause was written for, where the knowledge and the benefit can be proven. Proving them is the work: room records, repeat cash bookings, housekeeping reports, prior law enforcement contacts, staff complaints, and what management did with them.
Where Chapter 98 applies the remedies are stronger. Section 98.003 makes actual damages including mental anguish, court costs and reasonable attorney’s fees mandatory for a prevailing claimant, with exemplary damages additionally available. Section 98.005 makes such a defendant jointly liable for the entire amount of the trafficking damages. Section 98.007 gives the claimant the right to proceed under a confidential identity.
Most hotels operate under a franchise. The company on the sign, the company that owns the building and the company that manages it are frequently three separate entities with three separate insurers, and they will each point at the other two. Identifying the right defendants early is part of the work, not a detail.
Every statute and case linked above was read at its primary source. Texas statutes change every legislative session and case law is constantly changing.
This page is general information about Texas law. It is not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hotels generate more records than apartment complexes, and they overwrite them faster. What matters, and how fast it goes, is set out on the evidence page.
Keycard access logs showing every entry to the room and when. Front desk and folio records. Camera coverage of corridors, elevators, lobbies and lots, which is often retained for a week or less. Housekeeping and maintenance logs. Prior incident reports. Police call history for the address. Franchise inspection reports, where the property flies a brand’s flag.
A preservation letter in the first days matters more here than almost anywhere else, because the retention windows are short and the systems purge automatically.
Schiffer Law Firm handles hotel and motel liability claims in Houston and across Texas, including claims arising from sexual assault and from trafficking.
There is no charge to talk, and no attorney’s fee unless there is a recovery.
Call 713-521-0059.
This page is general information about Texas law, not legal advice about your situation, and reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Yes, where the hotel knew or should have known of a foreseeable risk and failed to act reasonably. There is also a separate claim under Chapter 98 where trafficking is involved.
They are usually different companies with separate insurance. Both may belong in the case, and identifying the right entities early matters.
Often within seven to thirty days. A preservation letter costs nothing and stops the overwrite.
No. A civil claim against the hotel does not require a report, a charge or a conviction. What a civil claim does need is evidence, and most of it is in the hotel’s own records, which are on an automatic timer.